“Son-in-Law” Schools “Purdue80″

January 29, 2007

Some high stakes no-limit action took place on Full Tilt table Halbert. As “Purdue80″ awaited an opponent, “Son-in-Law” took the seat across the table and the players engaged in some heads-up $300/$600 NL Hold’em. Althought “Purdue80″ attained the early lead, “Son-in-Law” controlled most of the match and with a good run of cards was able to rake in over $130K from “Purdue80″ after 80 minutes of play. A final $155K+ hand proved to be the end of the match as “Purdue80″ met his mtach and left the table.

Stack

The first big hand played between these two high stakes players occured as “Son-in-Law” just limped in pre-flop and both players saw a Q♣ 3♣ K♥ flop. “Pur♦ue80″ ♣♥e♣ke♦ over to “Son-in-Law” w♥o ma♦e a minimum $600 bet. A ♣all from “Pur♦ue80″ an♦ t♥e 6♥ ♥it t♥e turn. Anot♥er ♣♥e♣k over to “Son-in-Law” an♦ ♥e fire♦ again wit♥ a $1200 bet. “Pur♦ue80″ pulle♦ a ♣♥e♣k-rai♠e up to $3K total. “Son-in-Law” t♥en rerai♠e♦ it up to $8400 an♦ re♣eive♦ a ♣all from “Pur♦ue80″. W♥en t♥e 5♣ landed on the river “Purdue80″ checked it once again and “Son-in-Law” made a $12,600 bet into the $19K+ pot. Another check-raise from “Purdue80″ and “Son-in-Law” now faced an all-in call.

Hand A River

After some thought, “Son-in-Law” made the call and “Purdue80″ showed Q♥ 6♦ for two pair, Queen♠ an♦ Sixe♠. However, “Son-in-Law” reveale♦ 2♣ 4♦ for a rivered Six high straight which was good enough to take down the big $91K+ pot.

Full Tilt Poker Game #1693031432: Table Halbert (heads up)
$300/$600 - No Limit Hold’em - 3:31:05 ET - 2007/01/29
Seat 1: Purdue80 ($74,689.50)
Seat 2: Son-in-Law ($45,890)
Son-in-Law posts the small blind of $300
Purdue80 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Son-in-Law calls $300
Purdue80 checks
*** FLOP *** Q♣ 3♣ K♥
Purdue80 checks
Son-in-Law bets $600
Purdue80 calls $600
*** TURN *** Q♣ 3♣ K♥ 6♥
Purdue80 checks
Son-in-Law bets $1,200
Purdue80 raises to $3,000
Son-in-Law raises to $8,400
Purdue80 calls $5,400
*** RIVER *** Q♣ 3♣ K♥ 6♥ 5♣
Purdue80 checks
Son-in-Law bets $12,600
Purdue80 raises to $65,089.50, and is all in
Son-in-Law calls $23,690, and is all in
Uncalled bet of $28,799.50 returned to Purdue80
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Purdue80 shows Q♥ 6♦ (two pair, Queens and Sixes)
Son-in-Law shows 2♣ 4♦ (a straight, Six high)
Son-in-Law wins the pot ($91,779.50) with a straight, Six high
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $91,780 | Rake $0.50
Board: Q♣ 3♣ K♥ 6♥ 5♣
Seat 1: Purdue80 (big blind) showed Q♥ 6♦ and lost with two pair, Queens and Sixes
Seat 2: Son-in-Law (small blind) showed 2♣ 4♦ and won ($91,779.50) with a straight, Six high

“Son-in-Law” continued to roll on this next hand as his pre-flop reraise made it $5400 to go. “Purdue80″ made the call and the flop came T♦ Q♣ 9♠ . “Son-in-Law” ♠lowe♦ ♦own t♥i♠ time an♦ ♣♥e♣ke♦ it over to “Pur♦ue80″ w♥o fire♦ a $6K bet. “Son-in-Law” ma♦e t♥e ♣all an♦ ♣♥e♣ke♦ again on t♥e 5♥ turn. “Pur♦ue80″ ♣♥e♣ke♦ it t♥roug♥ to t♥e river w♥i♣♥ ♣ame 4♣. This time “Son-in-Law” led out with a $16,800 bet into the $22K+ pot.

Hand B River

A brief pause and “Purdue80″ made the call. “Son-in-Law” flipped over the A♦ A♥ for a pair of Aces in the hole. “Purdue80″ mucked and the Aces held up to take down a nice $56K+ pot.

Full Tilt Poker Game #1693126013: Table Halbert (heads up)
$300/$600 - No Limit Hold’em - 4:08:37 ET - 2007/01/29
Seat 1: Purdue80 ($60,987.75)
Seat 2: Son-in-Law ($100,864.25)
Purdue80 posts the small blind of $300
Son-in-Law posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Purdue80 raises to $1,800
Son-in-Law raises to $5,400
Purdue80 calls $3,600
*** FLOP *** T♦ Q♣ 9♠
Son-in-Law checks
Purdue80 bets $6,000
Son-in-Law calls $6,000
*** TURN *** T♦ Q♣ 9♠ 5♥
Son-in-Law checks
Purdue80 checks
*** RIVER *** T♦ Q♣ 9♠ 5♥ 4♣
Son-in-Law bets $16,800
Purdue80 calls $16,800
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Son-in-Law shows A♦ A♥ (a pair of Aces)
Purdue80 mucks
Son-in-Law wins the pot ($56,399.50) with a pair of Aces
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $56,400 | Rake $0.50
Board: T♦ Q♣ 9♠ 5♥ 4♣
Seat 1: Purdue80 (small blind) mucked
Seat 2: Son-in-Law (big blind) collected ($56,399.50)

The final hand of the match brought some fireworks. It commenced with a pre-flop reraise up to $5400 total. The flop came Q♠ 2♥ 2♦ an♦ “Son-in-Law” ♣ontinue♦ wit♥ a $7200 bet. “Pur♦ue80″ ma♦e t♥e ♣all an♦ t♥e K♥ ♥it t♥e turn. “Son-in-Law” fire♦ again wit♥ a $15K bet an♦ after ♠ome t♥oug♥t, “Pur♦ue80″ ma♦e t♥e ♣all. T♥e A♣ landed on the river and “Son-in-Law” bet the pot — enough to put “Purdue80″ all-in.

Hand C River

“Purdue80″ beat him into the pot with Q♣ Q♥ for a floppe♦ boat, Queen♠ Full. Unfortunately, t♥e A♣ on t♥e river gave “Son-in-Law” a ♠uperior full ♥ou♠e an♦ ♥e reveale♦ t♥e A♥ A♦ for Aces Full. This brutal hand ended the match as “Son-in-Law” raked himself a monster $155K+ pot.

Full Tilt Poker Game #1693173697: Table Halbert (heads up)
$300/$600 - No Limit Hold’em - 4:31:01 ET - 2007/01/29
Seat 1: Purdue80 ($77,592.50)
Seat 2: Son-in-Law ($113,256.75)
Purdue80 posts the small blind of $300
Son-in-Law posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Purdue80 raises to $1,800
Son-in-Law raises to $5,400
Purdue80 calls $3,600
*** FLOP *** Q♠ 2♥ 2♦
Son-in-Law bets $7,200
Purdue80 calls $7,200
*** TURN *** Q♠ 2♥ 2♦ K♥
Son-in-Law bets $15,000
Purdue80 calls $15,000
*** RIVER *** Q♠ 2♥ 2♦ K♥ A♣
Son-in-Law bets $55,200
Purdue80 calls $49,992.50, and is all in
Uncalled bet of $5,207.50 returned to Son-in-Law
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Son-in-Law shows A♥ A♦ (a full house, Aces full of Twos)
Purdue80 shows Q♣ Q♥ (a full house, Queens full of Twos)
Son-in-Law wins the pot ($155,184.50) with a full house, Aces full of Twos
Purdue80: nh
Purdue80 is sitting out
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $155,185 | Rake $0.50
Board: Q♠ 2♥ 2♦ K♥ A♣
Seat 1: Purdue80 (small blind) showed Q♣ Q♥ and lost with a full house, Queens full of Twos
Seat 2: Son-in-Law (big blind) showed A♥ A♦ and won ($155,184.50) with a full house, Aces full of Twos

Popularity: 8% [?]

Posted by D.B.Murdock | Filed Under High Stakes Poker Reports

Comments

2 Responses to ““Son-in-Law” Schools “Purdue80″”

dopey_215 on January 30th, 2007 12:50 am

Son in Law schools Purdue because he is a freakin luck box…change the heading it makes no sense….
WalkmanAA on January 30th, 2007 4:33 pm

Yah I agree man. It doesn’t take much skill to 3 bet the turn against a hand that has you crushed and then river a gutshot. I don’t play high stakes but usually when somebody raises me on a KQ63 board I don’t reraise with 4 high. Son in Law seems like some typical power player who just never stops raising and never folds. Last hand is a cooler but still Purdue has him totally trapped. No schooling going on there.

P.S. Hennigan is gonna win it today.

Got something to say?

“Son-in-Law” Schools “Purdue80″

Comments

Thank Our Sponsors

Recently Written

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Admin

Related Sites